How “Either/Or” Was Received in 1843 Copenhagen

Initial Publication Context

Either/Or was first published in Copenhagen, Denmark, in February 1843, under the pseudonym Victor Eremita. The publisher was C. A. Reitzel, one of the most prominent Danish publishers of the time, who had previously issued works of literary and philosophical interest. The Denmark of 1843 was a constitutional monarchy under King Christian VIII; it was a period marked by political conservatism prior to the 1849 adoption of a Danish constitution. Though the broader European landscape was moving toward increased press freedoms, Danish society remained relatively insular, with public discourse centered around theology, literature, and philosophy. Intellectual life in Copenhagen was dynamic within university circles and the educated bourgeoisie, while state censorship still played a minor but notable role in publishing decisions.

At the time of “Either/Or”‘s release, Danish literature was influenced by the growing movement of Romanticism as well as debates among theologians and philosophers. Reitzel’s publication of “Either/Or” was not accompanied by an extensive promotional campaign. Instead, books at that time typically depended on word of mouth, literary notices in newspapers, and discussion within reading societies and the intellectual salons of Copenhagen. The work’s release as a two-volume set and the use of a pseudonym generated curiosity among observers accustomed to pseudonymous or anonymous publication within philosophical and religious debates in Denmark.

Critical Reception

Initial critical response to “Either/Or” was divided and animated. Reviewers from Danish periodicals and cultural journals noted the book’s unconventional structure and the challenge of attributing its pseudonymous authorship. In early 1843, several literary critics in the Copenhagen press responded with lengthy columns analyzing the book’s format, its philosophical content, and its style. The newspaper **Berlingske Tidende** acknowledged the originality of the work but expressed difficulty in categorizing its genre or authorial intention. Its reviewer described it as an “enigmatic and fragmentary production,” noting the mix of literary essays, aphorisms, and fictional letters.

The journal **Fædrelandet**, a prominent paper of the era, released one of the earliest substantive reviews, focusing on the book’s perceived lack of clarity and accessibility to the average reader. Instead of consensus, reviewers debated the merits and coherence of the pseudonymous text. Some critics, including contributors to **Flyveposten**, speculated about the author’s identity, with a few suggesting that Copenhagen’s literary circles would soon solve the mystery.

Within academic and theological circles, responses were similarly mixed. University affiliates writing in academic journals like **Dansk Maanedsskrift** described “Either/Or” as a provocative and controversial addition to contemporary literature, with several noting that it might have been written with certain university professors or public figures in mind. Some reviewers felt the text was too elliptical and indirect, while others praised the philosophical ambition. It became a subject of discussion in faculty lounges and student societies, with dissent over whether the book contributed meaningfully to ongoing philosophical debates.

Literary reviewers occasionally commented on the book’s style, alternating between admiration and criticism. Some noted its “bewildering abundance of detail” and questioned the seriousness of its treatment of love, ethics, and everyday life. Others, often more sympathetic, suggested that its structure challenged conventions and would reward careful study. Despite disagreement, most critics agreed that “Either/Or” was unlike anything recently published in Denmark.

Public and Cultural Response

Public response to “Either/Or” was shaped largely by the work’s immediate visibility within Copenhagen’s literary and academic environment. Sales of the first print run were moderate and steady, with accounts from contemporary booksellers in Copenhagen and letters among local intellectuals recording frequent inquiries about the book’s availability and authorship. While the reading public in Denmark at the time was relatively small and concentrated in urban areas, “Either/Or” drew attention among university students, clergy, civil servants, and educated members of the bourgeoisie.

Discussions of the book appeared not only in newspaper columns but also in gatherings at Copenhagen coffee houses, salons, and social clubs. Accounts in periodicals such as **Maanedsskrift for Litteratur** noted lively background chatter about the book’s meaning and the identity of Victor Eremita. Some private letters and diaries from the era, including correspondence among university students, recorded heated debates about the ideas attributed to the various fictional voices in the volumes.

Bookstores carried the work prominently for the months following release, and there were reports in the Danish literary press that the two-volume set was requested in several lending libraries more frequently than typical philosophical treatises. However, because of the book’s length and its unorthodox structure, not all readers persevered with it, according to comments in period papers.

Some church officials and religious writers expressed concerns about the nature of the work, noting in informal correspondence and minor print journals that it might provoke controversy by introducing complex discussions of morality and individual choice to broader audiences. Nevertheless, no formal attempt at censorship or restriction was recorded during the initial months of the book’s publication.

Early Impact

In the months and immediate years following its release, “Either/Or” became an established point of reference within the Copenhagen intellectual community. The work figured in ongoing cultural and theological debates, and the question of Victor Eremita’s true identity was periodically revisited in local newspapers and student circles throughout 1843 and 1844. While not attaining mass popular attention, the book was cited in literary periodicals and discussed in reading rooms alongside major contemporary Danish publications.

Press records from 1843–1845 indicate that the book maintained a modest but steady cultural visibility. Its appearance sparked short-lived imitations and anonymous parodies in minor literary magazines. Formal references to “Either/Or” occasionally appeared in public lectures sponsored by university and philosophical societies, where it served as a touchstone for discussions about the boundaries of literary form and philosophical inquiry.

There were no major public protests or widespread acclaim reported in the immediate aftermath of publication, but the work was sufficiently notable to inspire further speculation and commentary about its significance, authorship, and content. Notably, collections of Danish literary criticism from the 1840s continued to reference “Either/Or” as a subject of critical attention beyond its initial release period.

---

Related Sections

Additional reference coverage for “Either/Or” is available in the sections below.
Historical context
Fact check
Early reception
Additional historical and reader-oriented information for “Either/Or” is discussed on related reference sites.